|
8
Model Description 8.2.1
Supply System 8.2.2
Reservoir Operations 8.2.3
Moraine Seepage 8.2.4
Instream Flow Requirements 8.2.5
Demand Forecasts 8.2.6
Conservation 8.2.8
Hydrologic Data 8.3.7 TSI/SSP
8.2.7 Seattle Future Sources
Aside from the Tacoma-Seattle Intertie, which is detailed in
the Tacoma Workbook, Seattle is evaluating other alternatives for increasing its
water supply. The sources listed in Table 8.5 have been incorporated into
the CRYSTAL model and can be evaluated for performance relative to the Second
Supply Project.
Table 8.5
Other Potential Supply Sources for Seattle in CRYSTAL
|
Source |
Comments |
|
Drawdown in South Fork Tolt Reservoir |
South Fork Tolt Reservoir
drawdown levels can be increased when the Tolt Treatment Facility is
brought online to address turbidity issues. In addition, incorporating
the Tolt Treatment Facility will change dead storage elevation in the
South Fork Tolt Reservoir from 1730’ to 1710’. This option is
estimated to provide an additional 11 mgd in yield (Seattle, 1999). This
action is connected to different instream flow requirements that have
been incorporated into CRYSTAL. |
|
Additional Drawdown in South Fork Tolt Reservoir |
After the implementation of
the Tolt Treatment Facility, Further drawdown of the reservoir to 1690'
or 1660' is possible. Seattle estimates an additional increase yield of
8 mgd (for a total benefit of 19 mgd for the Tolt Treatment Facility)
(Seattle, 1999). |
|
Highline Aquifer Storage and Recharge |
The Highline wells are used
during summer peaking periods, at a current capacity of 10 mgd. Aquifer
storage and recharge studies suggest that a yield of 12-15 mgd could be
provided for up to 4 months. |
The sources listed in Table 8.6 include some of the regional
supply options that are currently being evaluated by Seattle. These elements
have not yet been incorporated into the CRYSTAL model.
Table 8.6 Other Potential
Regional Supply Sources
|
Source |
Comments |
|
Additional Drawdown in Chester Morse Reservoir |
Pumping of water in Chester
Morse Lake below the natural outlet helped mitigate potential shortfalls
in 1987. This option may be incorporated into permanent operation
policies as reliable supply. Current discussions with fisheries managers
on the Cedar River suggest that this option may be implemented only once
in every 4 years, and would be dependent on the outcome of instream flow
negotiations. Yield from this potential supply is estimated at 20 mgd
(Seattle, 1999). |
|
Diversion on the North Fork Tolt |
A diversion intake would be
constructed on the North Fork Tolt River, and would be operated in
conjunction with the existing South Fork Tolt facilities. This water
would be diverted into transmission pipelines for supply during winter,
allowing the Tolt Reservoir to refill. During summer, water stored in
the Tolt Reservoir would be used to meet municipal demands and instream
fish flows until the North Fork flows exceeded the instream flow
requirements. Yield from this potential supply is estimated at 40 mgd
(Seattle, 1999). |
|
Development of the Snoqualmie Aquifer |
In 1994, the
East King County Regional Water Association (EKCRWA) and Seattle filed a
joint water right application to withdraw 60 mgd from the Upper
Snoqualmie basin. Groundwater would be extracted to augment streamflows
and to meet municipal demands. Technical studies conducted to support
the water right application indicate that this supply may provide up to
16 mgd in additional yield (Seattle, 1999). |
Seattle Public Utilities, 1999.
Revised Draft: Firm Yield of Seattle's Existing and Alternative Water Supply
Sources.
Table
of Contents 8.1.1 Everett Supply
System 8.3.1 Tacoma Supply System
|